Applied AI / 2024 — 2025

Market Analysis & Financial Insights

Economic indicators, sentiment features and model comparison.

MARKET ANALYSISSAVED CORRELATION OUTPUT
Repository correlation heatmap of 18 market parameters, including GDP, CPI, sentiment and inflation rate

01 / THE PROBLEM

Finding signal in context.

Economic time series arrive at different frequencies and describe different aspects of the market. This project explores how to align those indicators, inspect their relationships and compare regression approaches.

My contribution

Project contributor

I contributed to this market-analysis project, which brings together data preparation, correlation analysis and a Streamlit interface for comparing inflation-regression models.

02 / TECHNICAL APPROACH

Inside the
implementation.

  1. 01

    Notebooks prepare GDP, CPI, unemployment, treasury and bond yields, exchange rates and interest-rate data. A Sentiment column is included in the correlation analysis.

  2. 02

    Date parsing, merges, interpolation and an experimental Fourier interpolation step align series. Saved correlation plots make relationships inspectable.

  3. 03

    The Streamlit source offers Random Forest, XGBoost, LSTM, a dense neural network and Support Vector Regression to predict inflation_rate from numeric features.

  4. 04

    The evaluation code computes MAE, MSE, RMSE and R². It standardizes features before a random split, which needs correction before making reliable time-series generalization claims.

03 / SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

Follow the signal.

Select a stage to explore
how the system works.

01

Economic series

GDP, CPI, unemployment, yields, exchange rates, interest rates and a pre-existing Sentiment feature appear in the notebooks.

04 / SAVED ANALYSIS

The relationships, visible.

Inspect the original correlation heatmap Full original market correlation heatmap including the sentiment featureOpen full-resolution figure

A saved notebook visualization. No fresh model inference or headline sentiment prediction is performed.

05 / RESULTS & OUTCOMES

What the work delivers.

5Regression model options
18Variables in the correlation analysis
4Evaluation metrics

The workflow compares five regression approaches and reports MAE, MSE, RMSE and R². The correlation heatmap helps explore relationships between 18 variables; it does not establish causation. Reliable predictive performance still needs chronological validation.

Scope & limitations

  • The exact processed training CSV referenced by the Streamlit app is not present in the public tree and the path is machine-specific.
  • The origin and scoring model of the Sentiment column are not verified. This site does not offer a headline sentiment classifier.
  • No live inference is connected. This is an educational analysis project, not investment advice or a trading system.

06 / ENGINEERING DECISIONS

The interesting
constraints.

Aligning different time scales

The notebooks merge and interpolate economic series. Interpolation creates estimates, not new independently observed hourly data.

Evaluation can mislead

Random splits and fitting the scaler before splitting can leak information. Chronological validation and train-only preprocessing are necessary next steps.

ENGINEERING TAKEAWAY

A credible prediction starts with the data timeline and a defensible evaluation split.

07 / BUILDING BLOCKS

Tools with
a purpose.

Pandas / NumPy
Series preparation and analysis
Scikit-learn / XGBoost
Regression comparison
TensorFlow / Keras
Neural-network experiments
Streamlit / Matplotlib
Exploration and visual reporting

Go to the source

NEXT PROJECT / 04

AI Energy Forecasting Dashboard